Why Macroevolution Doesn’t Work

How Theistic Evolution Impacts One’s View of God’s Attributes | Fuz Rana...

Is There a Philosophical Bias in Science?

Despite the compelling evidence for design in nature, why do so many scientists resist the idea of a Creator? Is the debate purely scientific, or is there a philosophical bias?

In this discussion, biochemist Bob DiSilvestro joins astrophysicist Jeff Zweerink to unpack some of the reasons behind this resistance. Drawing from his personal experiences in academia, Dr. DiSilvestro explores why discussions about design are met with skepticism and hostility. They also tackle the common argument of “imperfect” designs in nature. Are these imperfections flaws, or do they serve a greater purpose?

13 minutes.

The Debate Happening Within Evolutionary Science

Darwin's Theory explains minor changes (finch beak variations, changes of pigmentation in moths, etc.) pretty well. But to say that all life descended from a single remote common ancestor is a stretch.